Canon i-SENSYS MF8340Cdn

alaTest ha raccolto ed analizzato 17 recensioni su Canon i-SENSYS MF8340Cdn. La media della valutazione per questo prodotto è 3.9/5, confrontata con la media della valutazione di 4.0/5 per altri prodotti. La valutazioni circa design e prezzo sono globale positive. In aggiunta, dimensione e performance ottengono ottime recensioni, tuttavia la multifunzione ha ottenuto recensioni non positive.

usabilità, performance, dimensione, prezzo, design

multifunzione, gestione carta, pannello controllo

Abbiamo analizzato differenti valutazioni di esperti ed utenti, età del prodotto ed altri elementi. A confronto con altri prodotti, Canon i-SENSYS MF8340Cdn ha ottenuto un alaScore™ complessivo di 79/100 = qualità Buono.

Analisi recensione

(Basato su 17 recensioni)

Recensioni Utente  

Visualizzate 12 recensione/i

Recensioni Esperto Recensioni Utente

Disclaimer:

Di seguito è riportato un elenco di recensioni per questo o prodotti simili. Se pensi che questo raggruppamento è sbagliato, fare clic qui per bandiera.
Per saperne di più sulla nostra pagina delle FAQ.
Visualizza 1 - 10 di 12 Visualizza Recensioni: in Italia | tutte le recensioni

Recensione utente (reevoo.com)

Canon i-SENSYS MF8340CDN

 

Couldn't find a Windows 7 64 bit driver on the installation disk or Canon website.

05/2013

Recensione utente (reevoo.com)

Canon I-SENSYS MF8340CDN

 

Couldn't find a Windows 7 64 bit driver on the installation disk or Canon website

04/2013

Recensione utente (reevoo.com)

Canon i-SENSYS MF8340CDN

 

Printing quality excellent. Small compact size. Very easy to set up on office computers. Speed seems decent for a smaller office printer, but have not had much experience with them.

Cannot work out duplex scanning FROM the printer. Only remotely, which is a bit annoying when your computer is at the other end of the office!

04/2013

Recensione utente (reevoo.com)

Canon i-SENSYS MF8340CDN

 

Good quality machine auto double sided sheet feeder fast print and copy

problems with Mac computers, all manuals and disks are windows, you have to download scan cannot be initiated from Computer only printer panel, Canon not able to offer a solution Goes to sleep and seems no way to make it awake on use photo quality not...

04/2013

Recensione utente (reevoo.com)

Canon I-SENSYS MF8340CDN

 

Printing quality excellent. Small compact size. Very easy to set up on office computers. Speed seems decent for a smaller office printer, but have not had much experience with them

Cannot work out duplex scanning FROM the printer. Only remotely, which is a bit annoying when your computer is at the other end of the office

03/2013

Recensione utente (reevoo.com)

Canon I-SENSYS MF8340CDN

 

Good quality machine ; auto double sided sheet feeder ; fast print and copy

problems with Mac computers, all manuals and disks are windows, you have to download ; scan cannot be initiated from Computer only printer panel, Canon not able to offer a solution ; Goes to sleep and seems no way to make it awake on use ; photo...

03/2013

Recensione utente (reevoo.com)

Canon i-SENSYS MF8340CDN

 

Nice printer not too big on your desktop. Auto shutdown is nice feature. I use network connection and all works well with Win7 x64bit.

Very heavy, slightly noisier than expected. Scanning to PC is a little fiddly.

11/2012

Recensione utente (reevoo.com)

Canon I-SENSYS MF8340CDN

 

Nice printer not too big on your desktop. Auto shutdown is nice feature ; I use network connection and all works well with Win7 x64bit

Very heavy, slightly noisier than expected ; Scanning to PC is a little fiddly

11/2012

Recensione utente (reevoo.com)

Canon i-SENSYS MF8340CDN

 

Spent lots of time looking at a number of printers and couldn't really find the right one that was able to offer all that I wanted, and was cheap to run - this was the one.

None so far.

10/2012

Recensione utente (reevoo.com)

Canon I-SENSYS MF8340CDN

 

Spent lots of time looking at a number of printers and couldn't really find the right one that was able to offer all that I wanted, and was cheap to run - this was the one

None so far

09/2012
1
2