Xerox Phaser 4622

alaTest ha raccolto ed analizzato 11 recensioni su Xerox Phaser 4622. La media della valutazione per questo prodotto è 4.3/5, confrontata con la media della valutazione di 4.0/5 per altri prodotti. Le persone rispondono positivamente alla rumore e dimensione. In aggiunta, design e affidabilità sono inoltre apprezzati. Le opinioni circa prezzo e usabilità sono dissimili.

performance, affidabilità, design, dimensione, rumore

gestione carta

Abbiamo analizzato differenti valutazioni di esperti ed clienti, età del prodotto ed altri elementi. A confronto con altri prodotti, Xerox Phaser 4622 ha ottenuto un alaScore™ complessivo di 83/100 = qualità Molto buono.

Analisi recensione

(Basato su 11 recensioni)

Recensioni Esperto  

Recensioni Utente  

Visualizzate 11 recensione/i

Recensioni Esperto Recensioni Utente

Disclaimer:

Di seguito è riportato un elenco di recensioni per questo o prodotti simili. Se pensi che questo raggruppamento è sbagliato, fare clic qui per bandiera.
Per saperne di più sulla nostra pagina delle FAQ.
Visualizza 1 - 10 di 11 Visualizza Recensioni: in Italia | tutte le recensioni

Recensione esperto da : Martyn Clayden (techadvisor.co.uk)

Xerox Phaser 4622 mono laser printer review

 

The basic unit is undeniably solid, measuring a squat 476 x 541 x 420mm and weighing a back punishing 35kg. It comes with a fold-down 100-sheet multipurpose tray at the front and a 550-sheet paper feeder tray at the bottom, with a maximum output on top...

Big on volume, swift on speed and high on quality, the Xerox Phaser 4622 is an obvious choice for small to medium businesses needing a dependable page churner. It's only let down by a slightly less user friendly control panel and £250 extra cost for WiFi.

06/2014

Recensione utente (xerox.com)

great speed, expandable

 

The printing is fast, even in duplex mode. The manual feed is a multi-step process that is a more complicated than our old printer but the paper storage and speed makes up for it.

01/2017

Recensione utente (xerox.com)

Almost perfect

 

We have had this printer in our company for almost a full year, so I can write a review based on real experience. We have no issues with 4622 except for one small nuisance. When using secure print (typing PIN before releasing documents on the printer),...

11/2016

Recensione utente (xerox.com)

Fuser life date cannot be reset

 

After getting poor quality printing and replacing the entire maintenance, which includes a fuser, the system does not reset the date of the fuser replacement. I called tech support and they told me that it how it is, some of them would reset it after a...

10/2016

Recensione utente (xerox.com)

No other laser like it!

 

If you are looking to print envelopes from the a real tray instead of a bypass, this is the ONLY LASER that will do the job. And boy does it do the job well! Xerox has set the bench mark so high with this machine that I doubt they will have any...

11/2015

Recensione utente (xerox.com)

IF YOU NOT DOWN WITH XEROX....

 

WE GOT 3 words for ya......BEST PRINTER EVER!!!! I USED THIS FOR WORK AND i decided to buy one for my personal use.the quality is great the speed better and the ease as far as its functionality amazing!!!!!

09/2015

Recensione utente (xerox.com)

Phaser 4622

 

It was advertised with built in Accounting feature but there was none. I called support and they said I needed a hard drive($400 more) which had the software. I tried that and there was no way to enable that feature... many calls later and I was told...

08/2015

Recensione utente (xerox.com)

havent had any paper jams

 

weve printed over 30000 orders and never had a paper jamb.

07/2015

Recensione utente (xerox.com)

Fast

 

We purchased this machine to replace an old HP printer and we are very happy with the purchase. We had some issues getting it to work with our system, but Xerox stepped up and wrote us our own driver and it's been working great!

05/2015

Recensione utente (xerox.com)

Great product

 

Speed is excellent, has increased productivity and improved the print quality.

03/2015
1
2