Canon imageCLASS MF8080CW

usability, performance, print quality

multifunction

44% of the reviews on Amazon.co.uk give this product a positive rating.

100% der Kundenmeinungen auf Amazon.de bewerten dieses Produkt positiv.

25% des avis sur Amazon.fr donnent une note favorable à ce produit.

67% de los comentarios en Amazon.es otorgan a este producto una calificación positiva.

Dedicated scan destinations, Front USB socket, Dedicated Eco-copy key

Slow black and colour print, Low-capacity paper tray, No duplex print

Prints, scans, and faxes. Automatic document feeder. Ethernet and WiFi support.

Low paper capacity for a shared printer. Bigger and heavier than competitors. No duplexer, even as an option.

More Multi-function Printer Reviews:• Brother MFC-L8610CDW• Brother MFC-L8900CDW• HP OfficeJet Pro 6978 All-in-One Printer• OKI MC573dn• Canon Pixma TS9020 Wireless Inkjet All-in-One Printer• more

The Canon i-SENSYS MF8080Cw's lack of automatic duplexing, its weak grayscale graphics, and its frustratingly long delay in producing the first page of any print job are good reasons to check the competition for a better deal. But most MFPs in this...

Prints fast enough. Scan quality is decent. Fax works well. Black quality is good

Color print quality is poor, the images printed are overly bright and quality is washed out. Canon claims this is a fast printer (first to print), not true, my Brother monochrome will beat this from the start and spits out better quality blacks in half...

It is a great printer that effortlessly networks both PC and Mac. For home office use I think I got a great deal. The toner is relatively affordable with several third party suppliers. At $170 with a starter kit of toner it easily beats out ninety nine...

I wish the paper hopper was deep enough to hold a full ream of paper

Fast scans, excellent color print quality, low price

Won't automatically remote scan. When set up to "remote scan", you can't print. That's another trip to the machine

1. Great print quality. pretty good ; 2. Fast scan ; 3. Color copy quality. nice

1. Slow printing speed (color) ; 2. Remote scan method. If you want to scan something on your PC, you must select "remote scan" on the machine ; 3. remote Scan quality. It is not good

Cheap

Slow. Really slow. Pain in the rear slow. Wish you spent a little more and got a faster one slow

Well specified, decent price (would have been even better if the cash back was still available when I purchased it), straight forward to get on wireless.

As someone else said, not native network scanning. Also sheet feeder feeds all documents ever so slightly crooked when scanning (even when the most care is taken and the set-up is perfect) which is like scraping finger nails down a blackboard for me...

Well specified, decent price (would have been even better if the cash back was still available when I purchased it), straight forward to get on wireless

As someone else said, not native network scanning. Also sheet feeder feeds all documents ever so slightly crooked when scanning (even when the most care is taken and the set-up is perfect) which is like scraping finger nails down a blackboard for me...